Book Review: Churchill and Africa: Empire, Decolonisation, and Race

Churchill and Africa: Empire, Decolonisation, and Race by C. Brad Faught (Tyndale University) is a slim but thoughtful study of Winston Churchill’s relationship with the African continent. As a young army officer and war correspondent Churchill was at the Battle of Omdurman and served in the South African War, while as a junior member of the Liberal government he was concerned with African matters as Under-Secretary of State for Colonies. In 1907 he made a lengthy tour of East Africa, traveling through Somaliland, Kenya, Uganda, Sudan, and Egypt. Churchill’s involvement in African affairs continued when he held the post of Colonial Secretary in 1921-22 and as prime minister both during the Second World War and in his second tenure in office from 1951-55, when his government dealt with the issues of decolonization and the Mau Mau Insurgency.

In the book’s conclusion, Faught addresses the controversial question of Churchill and racism and the charge of Churchill being a racist. He writes that by the standards of today “the answer is yes […] On the other hand, by the standards contemporaneous to when Churchill was alive, he should not be seen as a racist. At no time in his long connection with Africa can it be said that he held racist views of a remorseless, or programmatic, or murderous kind.”

This Day in Churchill History

Winston Churchill was nearly killed in a car accident in New York City on December 13, 1931.

Churchill arrived in New York by ship four days before the accident to begin a lecture tour of the United States and Canada. Late on the evening of December 13th, he was invited around to the home of his great friend the financier Bernard Baruch, a ten minute drive from his room at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel. Only when he was leaving the hotel did Churchill remember that he did not know Baruch’s actual house number. He knew it was on Fifth Avenue. With Baruch’s home address not listed in the telephone directory, Churchill hailed a taxi thinking he could recognize the house if he drove down Fifth Avenue. He had visited it many times on his previous visit to New York in 1929. For an hour Churchill scoured Fifth Avenue from the cab, but no house seemed familiar. At 10:30 PM Churchill asked the driver to stop the cab on the Central Park side of the avenue, between Seventy-sixth and Seventy-seventh streets. He intended to cross the road and find the likely house on foot. He was, in fact, ten blocks away from Baruch’s house at 1055 Fifth Avenue. Paying the fare, including a tip, he left the taxi.

Churchill checked for oncoming traffic as he would at home in England and tried to cross the road against the lights during a break of the traffic. At the time, cars flowed in both directions along busy Fifth Avenue.  He reached the center of the street and tried to dash the rest of the way, but forgot the American rules of the road and did not look to his right. Only at the last second did Churchill look in that direction and saw a northbound car coming at him at about 35 miles per hour. In the second before he was hit, the then 57-year old Churchill formulated the thought that he was going to run down and killed. The driver of the medium-sized automobile, Mario Contasino, slammed on the brakes. An accident was unavoidable. Churchill was struck and slammed to the pavement three or four feet from the point that the car screeched to a stop. He took the violent impact on his forehead and across his thighs. He later compared the collision to when a German artillery shell had struck the room he was in while serving at the front in World War One.

Seeing the accident, traffic quickly stopped on Fifth Avenue and people rushed out into the street. Despite the force of the crash and being in great pain, Churchill did not lose consciousness. He was able to tell the police officer on the scene his name and particulars – he was already an internationally famous statesman and politician – and added with particular emphasis that he alone had been at fault and entirely to blame for the collision. After a passing ambulance was unable to take Churchill, a taxi driver volunteered to shuttle him to the hospital. Lying unceremoniously on the floor of the cab and accompanied by a police officer, he was taken the short distance to Lenox Hill hospital. During the drive, Churchill became alarmed when he found he was unable to move his hands and feet.  By the time he reached the hospital, however, he was again able to move his fingers but was enduring “violent pins and needles” in his upper arms. 

Considering that the force of Churchill’s crash was the equivalent of falling 30 feet onto pavement, he could have easily suffered permanent or fatal injuries. As it was he escaped with a severe shock and concussion, a low fever, two cracked ribs, large bruises on his right arm, chest, and leg, a sprained shoulder, slight pleurisy on the right side, and contusions that needed sutures on his forehead and nose. At Lenox Hill, Churchill received a private room and given a detailed examination. Within days he had recovered enough to think about writing a “literary gem” about how it feels to be run over as well as receiving a thirty minute visit from Contasino, who was an unemployed young truck driver from Yonkers and had been checking on Churchill at the hospital nearly every day since the accident. Before Christmas 1931 Churchill was released from the hospital to rest at his hotel and at the end of the month left New York to complete his recovery in the Bahamas. A month later the unstoppable Churchill was back in the US to begin his rescheduled lecture tour. Mario Contasino attended the first New York lecture of the tour.

Churchill Research

Tags

In 1940 George Bernard Shaw sought to persuade Ireland to abandon its position of neutrality in the Second World War and also separately wrote to Prime Minister Winston Churchill privately, likely in June as France was collapsing, proposing Britain declare war on France and capture the French fleet. The declaration of war would be pro forma and, as such, he expected the fleet would surrender without a shot. Although Shaw was “wildly optimistic” on both counts, his ideas on Ireland and the French fleet were similar to those of Churchill and the British government. “Shaw’s Proposal and Churchill’s Hope” by Bernard F. Dukore discusses Shaw’s proposals and has been published in SHAW: The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies (43:2, 2023). The website for the journal is here.

Book Review: ‘Pug,’ Churchill’s Chief of Staff: The Life of General Hastings Ismay

General Hastings Ismay was one of Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s leading advisors during the Second World War and a “man who knew most of the secrets of the Second World War.” As chief of staff to the Minister of Defence and a member of the Chiefs of Staff Committee, Ismay worked on a daily basis with the prime minister, so much so that Churchill later wrote “we became hand in glove, and much more.” Avoiding taking a role in the formulation of military policy, Ismay, as the London Times noted, “conceived his role as being to run the machine which ran the war.” With his patience, tact, and friendly demeanor, he did so “supremely well.” After the war he served as a chief of staff to Lord Louis Mountbatten as the last Viceroy of India, chaired the Festival of British, and briefly served in Churchill’s post-war cabinet before being appointed the first Secretary-General of NATO. ‘Pug,’ Churchill’s Chief of Staff: The Life of General Hastings Ismay, KG, GCB, CH, DSO, PC 1887-1965 by Andrew Sangster is a short biography that covers Churchill’s relationship with his key subordinate. The author acknowledges that Ismay held the prime minister in great admiration, which actually to some historians veered close to hero-worship, and that Churchill was a difficult taskmaster.

Churchill Research

“The Churchill Day Book” at the Churchill Project seeks to pinpoint Churchill’s location and activity for every day of his life. The author of this blog has contributed the year 1943 to the day book. It is available at: https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/day-book-1943/.

On June 1, 1943, Churchill addressed British soldiers in the Roman amphitheatre at Carthage during a tour of North Africa (newsreel report above).

Book Review: Letters for the Ages: The Private and Personal Letters of Sir Winston Churchill.

While Winston Churchill’s correspondence is available to researchers in the official biography’s document volumes as well as via the Churchill Archive database, James Drake and Allen Packwood have set out to provide a general edition of selected correspondence in their book Letters for the Ages: The Private and Personal Letters of Sir Winston Churchill.

The volume consists of 100 letters arranged chronologically from a letter the eight-year Churchill wrote to his mother dated June 17, 1883 to a letter he received from his daughter 81 years later dated June 8, 1964. The book includes letters to and from family members, friends, politicians, royalty, and world leaders. Each letter is accompanied by an introduction providing its context. While the letters selected by the editors allows the reader to follow the twists and turns of Churchill’s personal and political life, a minor quibble would be the absence of a letter reflecting Churchill as a journalist or author. The text is supported by photographs and facsimiles of the letters.

Drake and Packwood have more than succeeded in their stated goal of providing “a readable and accessible” collection of the Churchill letters.

Book Review: Mary Churchill’s War: The Wartime Diaries of Churchill’s Youngest Daughter

Born in 1922, Mary Churchill was Winston and Clementine’s fourth daughter and youngest child. In January 1939, when she began keeping the diary that forms Mary Churchill’s War: The Wartime Diaries of Churchill’s Youngest Daughter edited by Emma Soames, Mary was a sixteen-year old and last of the Churchill children still living with their parents. During the war years she grew into a young adult, joined the Auxiliary Territorial Service serving with anti-aircraft batteries in Britain and in Europe, and accompanied her father on some of his travels, including as an aide at the Quebec Conference and on the prime minister’s visit to liberated France in 1944.The diaries are delightful as Mary records her personal thoughts and concerns as a teenager as well as her family life, social life, war service, and observations of the great events at which she was present as the daughter of the prime minister. Most interestingly, the diaries reflect her close relationship with her parents as well as the turbulent relationship her brother Randolph had with his family as she writes on January 3, 1943 that she does not love her brother and “cannot forgive him for the disappointment – sorrows & troubles he has caused Papa & Mummie.” In the diaries, Mary reflects a charming self-awareness when she writes on August 17, 1943 while at the Quebec Conference that “here I am daughter of one of the greatest men & reading my diary I find it is an account of ME!” She concludes that she cannot be “madly objective & Boswellian” and instead vows to continue to record “My day.” Mary Churchill’s War is an interesting and delightful read.

Book Review: The Crusading General: The Life of General Sir Bernard Paget, GCB, DSO, MC

Sir Bernard Paget was a senior British general during the Second World War who held a succession of important commands. However, in six years of war he only held command in an active theatre for seven days, as commander of Sickleforce in the ill-fated Norwegian campaign in April-May 1940. Although he was praised for his “skillful dispositions” in Norway by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in the House of Commons, Paget was denied by fortune another opportunity to command in battle. Instead, he served as commander of the Home Forces, 1941-43; 21st Army Group, 1943-44; and the Middle East, 1944-46.
The Crusading General: The Life of General Sir Bernard Paget, GCB, DSO, MC is a biography of the subject’s full career by his eldest son Julian Paget. An interesting chapter in the volume is “Who Planned D-Day (1942-44)” which reviews SKYSCRAPER, the plan Paget developed for the invasion of the continent, and compares it to the COSSAC plan by General F.E. Morgan and the plan that Montgomery actually implemented on June 6, 1944. Post-war, Bernard Paget expressed the opinion that SKYSCRAPER was much better than Morgan’s plan and was “very similar to that actually carried out.” The chapter “Forging the Sword (1941-43)” considers Paget’s training of the British army for the invasion of Europe. It was his “greatest achievement” and earned him the reputation as the greatest trainer of troops since Sir John Moore. The author writes that Paget “created and trained the 21st Army Group, but was denied the satisfaction of commanding it in battle. He was to Montgomery what Moore was to Wellington.”

Finest Hour

The theme of the latest issue (No. 203) of Finest Hour: The Journal of Winston Churchill and His Times is “Churchill and Leadership.” The issue includes the articles “The Leadership Paradigm” by Andrew Roberts, “I Lead Like Winston Churchill: Winston Churchill in the Lyrics of Popular Music” by Teresa Dalton and Greg Dhuyvetter, and “All History Stood Still: Winston Churchill and John F. Kennedy” by Kevin R. Loughlin. Additionally, the articles Churchill wrote on Queen Elizabeth I and Georges Clemenceau are reprinted in the issue. The website of Finest Hour is here.

Churchill Research

On August 1, 1914 the British cabinet of Prime Minister H.H. Asquith decided against sending the British Expeditionary Force to France and as late as August 4, the day Britain declared war on Germany, the cabinet was repeatedly told that the BEF would not be sent abroad. Only two days later, however, the cabinet changed course and approved the force’s despatch to France. In his article “The Asquith Cabinet and the Decision to Send an Expeditionary Force to France in 1914” (Diplomacy & Statecraft, 33:4, 2022), John W. Young (University of Nottingham) seeks to explain the maneuvering of the pro-Entente Asquith and his key ministerial allies Lord Chancellor Lord Haldane and the Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey in the first days of August 1914 and the cabinet’s eventual agreement to sending the BEF. Young concludes that “there had been good reasons for delay. If Asquith, Haldane and Grey […] had pressed for a more rapid deployment, it could have broken up the Cabinet and, perhaps, seriously delayed entry into the war at France’s side. Asquith was a past master at holding his team together and, even in the face of a great power conflagration, his cautious touch did not desert him.” Churchill, who was in the Cabinet as First Lord of the Admiralty, is described by Young as “always the most pro-war of ministers” who was “already committed in principle to sending the BEF to the continent” but was aware of the tactics being used by Asquith, Haldane, and Grey. The journal’s website is here.